Epicurean paradox - Wikipedia
The Epicurean paradox is a logical dilemma about the problem of evil attributed to the Greek philosopher Epicurus, who argued against the existence of a god who is simultaneously omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent.
Epicurus - Wikipedia
The Epicurean paradox or riddle of Epicurus or Epicurus' trilemma is a version of the problem of evil. Lactantius attributes this trilemma to Epicurus in De Ira Dei, 13, 20-21: God, he says, either wishes to take away evils, and is unable; or He is able, and is unwilling; or He is neither willing nor able, or He is both willing and able.
What is the Epicurus Dilemma? (The Problem of Evil)
2016年6月27日 · Epicurus (341-270 BCE) was an ancient Greek philosopher known today (particularly in skeptical circles) for providing what some claim is a knockdown argument against belief in God. Epicurus’ argument focuses on the problem of evil and how it might present a problem for a classical concept of God generally embraced by theists; Epicurus ...
The Epicurean Paradox – Epicurus Today
2018年6月28日 · The “Epicurean paradox” or “Riddle of Epicurus” is a version of the problem of evil. Lactantius attributes this trilemma to Epicurus in De Ira Dei: “God,” he says, “either wishes to take away evils, and is unable; or He is able, and is unwilling; or He is neither willing nor able, or He is both willing and able.”
Derivation of the “Riddle of Epicurus” - NewEpicurean.com
2013年12月18日 · Epicurus’ “riddle” is cited often on the internet, even in video form. As Wikipedia points out, however, “Epicurus himself did not leave any written form of this argument.” As the Wikipedia article also cites, the major modern source for this argument is David Hume’s formulation in Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion:
Epicurean Paradox - en.atheismfacts.org
The problem of evil, also known as the Riddle of Epicurus, states: Then He is not omnipotent. Then He is malevolent. Then whence cometh evil. Then why call Him God? A strong rebuttal is Plantinga's Free Will Defense, which some philosophizing theologians mistakenly believe is …
The Riddle of Epicurus In David Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Voltaire’s Candide, the characters struggle to reconcile the existence of evil with the existence of an omnipotent and benevolent God. “Epicurus’s old questions”, cited by Philo, aptly summarize the
The problem of evil, as described circa 300 B.C.
2008年4月17日 · In about 300 B.C., Epicurus eloquently summed up the problem of the existence of evil. It has come to be known as the Riddle of Epicurus or the Epicurean paradox. It was translated by David Hume in the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion: If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to Then He is not omnipotent. If He is able, but not ...
The Riddle of Epicurus: The Problem of Evil - GraduateWay
2017年2月22日 · Epicurus is credited to have formulated the problem, known as the “riddle of Epicurus.” It states that “If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to, then He is not omnipotent. If He is able, but not willing, then He is malevolent. If He is both willing and able, then where do evil come?
- 评论数: 156
Epicurean paradox - The Knowledgebase of Carlos Rodrigo
The Epicurean paradox or riddle of Epicurus or Epicurus’ trilemma is a version of the problem of evil. Lactantius attributes this trilemma to Epicurus in De Ira Dei, 13, 20-21: God, he says, either wishes to take away evils, and is unable; or He is able, and is unwilling; or He is neither willing nor able, or He is both willing and able.
- 某些结果已被删除