Establishing a peer review of teaching process and community culture is not easy and takes time. Following recommendations from literature, research, and colleagues can help. A synthesis of this work ...

If the decision was “Revise,” upon receipt of the revision, the SME will evaluate the revised manuscript and either request further peer reviews (repeating steps 4–8 above) or make a decision (steps 7 ...

Here, we’ll describe how an in-house student-led peer-review journal can help develop research literacy ... in the autumn of 2015 and published our first issue in June of 2016. Step 1: Find a willing ...

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary ...

Instructors should identify a particular assignment or task that could benefit from peer-review in the course. This includes multi-step projects and formative assessments (e.g., low-stakes homeworks ...

First established in 2020 as a pilot program, the Army Command Assessment Program evaluates senior military leaders for ...

This guide is designed to provide faculty and departments with insights on performing effective peer review of teaching. It was developed in October 2017 by members of a Faculty Learning Community: ...

A new open review system called MetaROR aims to reform the “broken” peer review academic publishing process by allowing ...

URL-shortening services like Bitly and TinyURL have become so common that we hardly think twice about using them. Such ...

A meta-analysis found that peer reviews in radiation oncology led to recommendations to change treatment plans in more than ...

One of the core features of the scientific community is the concept of “peer review” where any claims ... we typically only feature the first step of this process, the original projects ...

The Editor-in-Chief must approve all accept and reject decisions, except when away or recused from peer review. Authors can expect to learn of a decision on their paper approximately 4 weeks after ...